Review #8 - Eagle Rare

-
Today sucked, it sucked enough I decided I deserved a whiskey when I got home. Something less complex than work was, so bourbon. Can the Eagle deliver?






Nose: Orange zest, caramel, oak, marshmallow.

Palate: Toasty brown sugar, corn sweetness, cherries jubilee, vanilla and oak, slightly peppery.

Finish: Medium. Toffee and charred oak.

Verdict: Simple but good. I wish it had a bit more depth, but overall the flavors are there. The cherry note in the middle of the palate is fun. Nothing stands out enough to make this worth the money to me, but it's sure as hell not bad in any way.

Would I buy this: No, probably not again. It's not enough better than the Buffalo Trace regular to warrant the 15 bucks extra it costs here. Don't get me wrong, it's a very good bourbon. But I usually only keep one bottle of bourbon in the house, and when this is gone, it's probably going to be something else.
(Author's Note: I don't only keep one bottle of bourbon in the house anymore. Not by a long shot. Man, it's been a while since I wrote this review! I'd also pick this over regular BT pretty easily these days. 15 bucks was a lot more of my whiskey budget back then.)

Would I order this in a bar: Yes

Would I drink this if someone gave me a glass: Absolutely.

Rating: ★★★★

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review #76 - Still Austin Bourbon (Batch #2)

-
Image
This sample was a gift from a friend. Hi Travis! I went into it knowing only that it was Bourbon from Still Austin. Nose: Corn, vanilla, lemon, caramel, oak, light nutmeg, old varnish, gun oil, shoe polish. Palate: Sweet corn, popcorn, caramel, burnt peanut, pepper, bitter clove, flamed orange peel, vanilla. Finish: Corn, vanilla, a little pepper. Sweet mostly. Long but simple. Verdict: Tastes young, I'd bet 12-18 months? Maybe 95-100 proof? Has a lot of harsh notes right in the middle of the palate. The nose has some weird unpleasantness, but the base Bourbon notes underly all of it. Might be fine with more time, but as is, I don't care for it. Would I buy this: I'm betting this is craft priced, so 35-50 a bottle. In which case, nuh-uh. Would I order this in a bar: Probably not. Would I drink this if someone gave me a glass: I would, but mostly so I could discuss what I do and don't like abut it with them. Final notes: Looking this up I see it is 100
Read more

Review #72 - Barrell Bourbon Batch #11

-
Image
Nose: Vanilla and oak predominate. Hints of baking spices, especially allspice. Buttered corn, and something a little citrusy, like dried orange peels. A little brown sugar. It's an inviting and intriguing nose. The proof doesn't come across, even sticking my nose in and breathing deeply. Palate : Cocoa, baking spices, vanilla, sweet corn, a little mineral, hints of cream. Sort of all over the place. Not unbalanced, but just doesn't work well together somehow. Finish : Oak, floral Mexican cinnamon, toasted pecan, marshmallow, white pepper. Pretty nice. If it had slightly less wood to it that would be better.  Verdict : 6 year old, 114.8 proof, and not bad, but Barrell has sure done better. Would I buy this : Depending on the price, yes. Knowing what Barrell bourbons usually go for, no. Would I order this in a bar : Maybe. Do they not have ECBP? Would I drink this if someone gave me a glass : Absolutely. It's pretty good. Rating :★★★
Read more

Review #75 - Scapa Skiren

-
Image
Nose: Warm honey. Clotted cream. Ripe pear, bitter orange peel, apple, a little fennel seed. Palate: The honey sweetness continues. Fresh crushed malt, sweet cream, pear, dried orange, lemon, a little pineapple. Hints of oak and vanilla. Finish: Medium. Sweet oak and a dusting of cinnamon. Verdict: It's a fine whiskey. But it's not a great one. Comparing this to the 16 year, though, this falls far, far short of it. The 16 was my favorite warm summer day scotch. This is...boring. Would I buy this: At the price they want for it, not a chance. Would I order this in a bar: Probably not. Would I drink this if someone gave me a glass: Sure! It's certainly not bad. It's just not memorable or exciting in any way. Rating:★★
Read more